(nt) posted by rich121 on Januat 09:38:42 In Reply to: RE: Well, I can see why your name is "rich".
RE: Well, I can see why your name is "rich". remember, you never can equate someones stereo gear ownership into how much $$ he as, as, many times, it IS the reason for his financial place. How does owning an almost 40 year old RCM make me someone who has alot of $$?Īctually, it's quite the quantrary. (nt) posted by genungo on Januat 05:09:39 In Reply to: RE: All I know, is I love my Keith Monks KMAL MKIII posted by rich121 on Januat 01:11:31 Well, I can see why your name is "rich". They were one of the earliest record cleaning machines, copied by many, and still being produced as the 'Gemini' MKIII.įor the amount you want to spend, I would say get the VPI 16.5, it has a large fan base. I can clean 2 records at the same time, has a powerful vacuum and is not loud at all. In Reply to: RE: Record Cleaning Machines, is there a consensus? posted by Spun on Januat 10:52:36Īnd have posted it here it is again. 
All I know, is I love my Keith Monks KMAL MKIII - rich121 01:11:31 01/30/11. [This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: 
I have Opera/Consanance, VPI, and Nitty-Gritty on my radar.any opinions?Īnd while we are at it, what about new inner sleeves? I plan on going with MOFI but if there is something better I would consider it. My budget is about $ 700.00, although I would go a little higher if it meant getting something significantly better. I'm looking to buy my first vacuum record cleaning machine, and it's not something you can really test at home. Most subjects in audio create polar opposition so I'm kinda expecting a variety of opinions, but here goes.
0 kommentar(er)
